BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO
BPRF.TO (Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF) and PREF.TO (Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BPRF.TO returned 3.83% vs 6.02% for PREF.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPRF.TO achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than PREF.TO's 3.18% return.
BPRF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- —
PREF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 0.58% | 4.85% | 6.27% |
PREF.TO Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF | 3.18% | 6.77% | 9.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPRF.TO and PREF.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BPRF.TO
PREF.TO
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) and Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF (PREF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPRF.TO | PREF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.02 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 9.52 | -5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPRF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, which is greater than PREF.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPRF.TO and PREF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPRF.TO | PREF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.50% | -6.24% | -29.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -1.50% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.58% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -0.75% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.63% | +0.34% |
Volatility
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF (BPRF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF (PREF.TO) at 1.23%. This indicates that BPRF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PREF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPRF.TO | PREF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 1.23% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | 2.90% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.57% | 4.05% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 5.20% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 5.20% | +8.54% |
Dividends
BPRF.TO vs. PREF.TO - Dividend Comparison
BPRF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than PREF.TO's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPRF.TO Brompton Flaherty & Crumrine Investment Grade Preferred ETF | 5.91% | 5.78% | 5.72% | 6.02% | 5.71% | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.27% |
PREF.TO Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF | 6.61% | 6.60% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPRF.TO and PREF.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Quadravest.
Find the right allocation for BPRF.TO and PREF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer