PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAY vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BPAY vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BPAY vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-18.60%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
9.42%35.14%2.68%18.96%-6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -18.60% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 9.42% return.


BPAY

1D
-0.02%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-18.60%
6M
-26.54%
1Y
-4.51%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
10Y*

EMXC

1D
1.11%
1M
-7.62%
YTD
9.42%
6M
18.97%
1Y
48.03%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BPAY vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BPAY vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPAYEMXCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

2.34

-2.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.02

3.02

-3.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.44

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

3.39

-3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

14.12

-14.39

BPAY vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and EMXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPAYEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

2.34

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.40

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and EMXC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BPAY vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than EMXC's 2.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.97%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.57%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and EMXC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAYEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-42.81%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-14.41%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

-9.89%

-21.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-10.35%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

3.46%

+10.31%

Volatility

BPAY vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 7.85%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BPAYEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

10.61%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

16.16%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.27%

20.60%

+8.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

16.71%

+7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

19.51%

+4.68%