PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAVX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAVX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BPAVX having a 11.34% annualized return and HFCVX not far behind at 11.15%.


BPAVX

1D
0.68%
1M
4.71%
YTD
9.55%
6M
12.02%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
11.34%

HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
9.55%17.17%9.66%12.25%-2.63%25.22%3.85%27.58%-12.09%17.60%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAVX and HFCVX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2002

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between BPAVX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPAVX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAVX
BPAVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BPAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPAVXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

2.91

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

4.22

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

7.07

-4.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

21.66

-11.59

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAVX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPAVXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.91

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.68

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.41

+0.18

Drawdowns

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAVX drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAVX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAVXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.62%

-65.75%

+16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-3.77%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-11.32%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.42%

-16.81%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-39.39%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-8.24%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.23%

+1.15%

Volatility

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund (BPAVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPAVXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

6.85%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

9.16%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

13.26%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

16.46%

+1.87%

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAVX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPAVX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

BPAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPAVX
Boston Partners All Cap Value Fund
8.42%9.22%10.23%10.94%8.42%5.21%1.42%2.34%6.38%4.11%3.70%6.44%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPAVX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPAVX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAVX dropped -49.62% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPAVX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer