PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BP vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BP vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. (BP) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BP achieves a 21.57% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, BP has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 8.00%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.


BP

1D
-2.90%
1M
10.22%
6M
7.71%
YTD
21.57%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
8.00%
ALL TIME*
5.43%

MUB

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.36%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
0.66%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
1.83%
ALL TIME*
3.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$401.62M$345.57M$374.94M
$582.91M$451.94M$397.26M

BP vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BP
BP p.l.c.
21.57%24.54%-11.84%6.00%37.01%36.38%-41.31%5.83%-4.57%20.02%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
0.66%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.02%5.12%7.06%0.93%4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BP and MUB is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007

-0.10

The correlation between BP and MUB shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BP vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BP
BP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BP vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. (BP) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.76

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

5.61

-1.36

BP vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BP Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BP and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BP vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-13.68%

-61.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

-2.79%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-4.78%

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-11.62%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.91%

-13.68%

-50.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-1.36%

-11.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.22%

-2.22%

-23.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

0.87%

+6.03%

Volatility

BP vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

BP p.l.c. (BP) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 0.99%. This indicates that BP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.53%

0.99%

+9.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

2.43%

+20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.42%

2.95%

+25.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.61%

4.09%

+24.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.33%

4.91%

+26.42%

Dividends

BP vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

BP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than MUB's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BP
BP p.l.c.
4.85%5.64%6.20%4.71%3.94%4.83%9.21%6.52%6.41%5.66%6.37%7.63%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.23%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BP and MUB have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BP has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to MUB (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BP dropped -74.94% vs MUB's -13.68%.

MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BP and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer