PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOYAX vs. FLCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boyar Value Fund (BOYAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOYAX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than FLCSX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BOYAX has underperformed FLCSX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while FLCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


BOYAX

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.40%
YTD
5.85%
6M
7.45%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
7.31%

FLCSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.26%
YTD
9.75%
6M
11.60%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOYAX
Boyar Value Fund
5.85%12.41%11.40%14.14%-20.14%18.62%4.21%19.20%-7.52%15.97%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
9.75%27.49%26.31%23.51%-8.02%25.80%9.05%31.59%-13.62%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BOYAX and FLCSX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 1998

0.88

The correlation between BOYAX and FLCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOYAX vs. FLCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOYAX
BOYAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BOYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCSX
FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boyar Value Fund (BOYAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOYAXFLCSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.60

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

3.59

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.32

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

15.16

-8.03

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FLCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOYAX and FLCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOYAXFLCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.60

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.95

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.82

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.12

Drawdowns

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOYAX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOYAX and FLCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOYAXFLCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-63.67%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-9.55%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-18.82%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-21.69%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.02%

-37.11%

+4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.25%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-13.82%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.08%

+0.21%

Volatility

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison

Boyar Value Fund (BOYAX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) at 2.86%. This indicates that BOYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOYAXFLCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.86%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

9.31%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

12.19%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

16.85%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

18.66%

-2.24%

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOYAX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOYAX vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison

BOYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FLCSX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOYAX
Boyar Value Fund
4.28%4.53%7.87%0.50%0.52%0.41%1.85%3.87%5.20%1.68%1.79%2.79%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
5.92%6.50%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%7.63%3.25%3.61%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOYAX and FLCSX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOYAX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to FLCSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOYAX dropped -60.75% vs FLCSX's -63.67%.

FLCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOYAX and FLCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer