PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXX vs. XDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXX vs. XDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV's 10.23% return.


BOXX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
6M
1.88%
YTD
2.06%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*

XDIV

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.17%
6M
8.66%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXX vs. XDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOXX and XDIV is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXX vs. XDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV
XDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXX vs. XDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOXXXDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+33.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

8.83

1.31

+7.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

59.89

2.36

+57.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

504.46

10.38

+494.07

BOXX vs. XDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXX Sharpe Ratio is 12.51, which is higher than the XDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXX and XDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOXX vs. XDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum XDIV drawdown of -9.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and XDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXXXDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-9.16%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-9.16%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.03%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-1.27%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.08%

-2.07%

Volatility

BOXX vs. XDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.11%, while Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXXXDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

3.24%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.26%

10.20%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

12.70%

-12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

12.61%

-12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

12.61%

-12.24%

BOXX vs. XDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BOXX vs. XDIV - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOXX nor XDIV has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
XDIV
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXX and XDIV have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDIV has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to BOXX (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs XDIV's -9.16%.

On 1-year performance, XDIV leads with 21.53% vs 4.10% for BOXX. On fees, XDIV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDIV has performed better with a 21.53% return vs 4.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDIV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.

BOXX and XDIV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XDIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.08% for XDIV.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.51 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXX and XDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer