PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXX vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.99% return.


BOXX

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.93%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
4.72%
1M
-15.80%
YTD
-23.99%
6M
-22.44%
1Y
-36.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.65%4.37%5.07%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-23.99%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXX and IBIT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOXXIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+38.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.40

0.88

+8.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

59.06

-0.71

+59.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

519.27

-1.24

+520.51

BOXX vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXX Sharpe Ratio is 12.58, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXX and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOXX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXXIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-52.11%

+51.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-52.11%

+52.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-47.06%

+47.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-16.58%

+16.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

29.79%

-29.78%

Volatility

BOXX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.11%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.94%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXXIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

12.94%

-12.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

34.80%

-34.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

44.40%

-44.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

50.31%

-49.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

50.31%

-49.94%

BOXX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BOXX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOXX nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXX and IBIT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.94%) compared to BOXX (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, BOXX leads with 4.05% vs -36.83% for IBIT. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOXX has performed better with a 4.05% return vs -36.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

BOXX and IBIT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.25% for IBIT.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.58 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXX and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer