PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXX vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXX vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.57% return.


BOXX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*

BILS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXX vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.72%4.37%5.16%5.04%0.07%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
1.57%4.23%5.17%4.92%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXX and BILS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXX vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXX vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOXXBILSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-52.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.07

34.42

-25.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

58.74

128.51

-69.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

507.08

1,292.26

-785.18

BOXX vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXX Sharpe Ratio is 12.63, which is comparable to the BILS Sharpe Ratio of 16.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXX and BILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOXX vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum BILS drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and BILS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXXBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.41%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-0.03%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

-0.04%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.00%

+0.01%

Volatility

BOXX vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) has a higher volatility of 0.12% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.06%. This indicates that BOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXXBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

0.06%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.26%

0.14%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

0.23%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

0.31%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

0.30%

+0.07%

BOXX vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BOXX vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXX and BILS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOXX has higher volatility (0.12%) compared to BILS (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs BILS's -0.41%.

On 3-year performance, BOXX leads with 4.71% vs 4.61% for BILS. On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOXX has performed better with a 4.71% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.

BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.14% for BILS.

BILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.76 vs 12.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXX and BILS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer