PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXA vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BOXA vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BOXA vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.12%5.41%0.02%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.12%7.57%-0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXA achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.12% return.


BOXA

1D
-0.00%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
0.47%
1Y
2.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBND

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOXA vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BOXA vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXA
BOXA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXA vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXAFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.03

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

1.44

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.69

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.43

5.25

-1.83

BOXA vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXA and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXAFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.03

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.44

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between BOXA and FBND is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BOXA vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

BOXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FBND's 4.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Drawdowns

BOXA vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXA drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXA and FBND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXAFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-17.25%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.79%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-1.80%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-3.38%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.90%

+0.01%

Volatility

BOXA vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) is 1.55%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that BOXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BOXAFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.66%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

2.62%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.44%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.18%

5.90%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

6.08%

-1.90%