PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXA vs. BRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXA vs. BRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) and Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXA achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BRNY's 14.34% return.


BOXA

1D
0.13%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRNY

1D
0.74%
1M
5.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
15.95%
1Y
33.88%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXA vs. BRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.06%5.41%0.02%
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
14.34%22.02%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXA and BRNY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXA vs. BRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXA
BOXA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BRNY
BRNY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXA vs. BRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) and Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXABRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.64

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

14.33

-11.39

BOXA vs. BRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXA Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the BRNY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXA and BRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXABRNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.52

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.62

-0.73

Drawdowns

BOXA vs. BRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXA drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, smaller than the maximum BRNY drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXA and BRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXABRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-19.14%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-9.34%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

0.00%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-2.77%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.37%

-1.31%

Volatility

BOXA vs. BRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) is 1.35%, while Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that BOXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXABRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

3.96%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

10.27%

-7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

13.49%

-9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.15%

16.92%

-12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

16.92%

-12.77%

BOXA vs. BRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BRNY's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOXA vs. BRNY - Dividend Comparison

BOXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BRNY's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BOXA
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF
0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.33%0.30%0.23%0.68%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXA and BRNY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRNY has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to BOXA (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXA dropped -3.22% vs BRNY's -19.14%.

On 1-year performance, BRNY leads with 33.88% vs 3.10% for BOXA. On fees, BOXA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BOXA has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRNY has performed better with a 33.88% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOXA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BRNY.

BRNY has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.13% for BOXA.

Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BOXA and 0.79% for BRNY.

BRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXA and BRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer