BOXA vs. BRNY
BOXA (Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF) and BRNY (Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOXA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while BRNY is a fund fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BOXA returned 3.10% vs 33.88% for BRNY. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOXA charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BRNY.
Performance
BOXA vs. BRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOXA achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BRNY's 14.34% return.
BOXA
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRNY
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 33.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOXA vs. BRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BOXA Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.06% | 5.41% | 0.02% |
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 14.34% | 22.02% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOXA and BRNY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOXA vs. BRNY — Risk / Return Rank
BOXA
BRNY
BOXA vs. BRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) and Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOXA | BRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.44 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.64 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 14.33 | -11.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOXA | BRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.52 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.62 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
BOXA vs. BRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOXA drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, smaller than the maximum BRNY drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXA and BRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOXA | BRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -19.14% | +15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | -9.34% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | 0.00% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -2.77% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.37% | -1.31% |
Volatility
BOXA vs. BRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) is 1.35%, while Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that BOXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOXA | BRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 3.96% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 10.27% | -7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 13.49% | -9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 16.92% | -12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 16.92% | -12.77% |
BOXA vs. BRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOXA has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BRNY's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOXA vs. BRNY - Dividend Comparison
BOXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BRNY's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXA Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BRNY Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 0.33% | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.68% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOXA and BRNY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRNY has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to BOXA (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXA dropped -3.22% vs BRNY's -19.14%.
On 1-year performance, BRNY leads with 33.88% vs 3.10% for BOXA. On fees, BOXA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BOXA has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BRNY has performed better with a 33.88% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOXA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BRNY.
BRNY has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.13% for BOXA.
Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BOXA and 0.79% for BRNY.
BRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOXA and BRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer