BOUT vs. QMOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM).
BOUT and QMOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOUT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2018. QMOM is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015.
Performance
BOUT vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOUT vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 9.59% | -6.77% | 18.82% | 13.27% | -22.60% | 22.69% | 50.56% | 20.59% | -29.80% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 6.82% | 2.36% | 30.43% | 9.50% | -6.99% | -4.06% | 61.94% | 28.39% | -26.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than QMOM's 6.82% return.
BOUT
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 10.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
QMOM
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOUT vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOUT vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank
BOUT
QMOM
BOUT vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOUT | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.08 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.33 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 4.59 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOUT | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.27 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOUT and QMOM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOUT vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison
BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than QMOM's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.51% | 0.54% | 1.40% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
BOUT vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and QMOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOUT | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -39.13% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -13.55% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | -27.00% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -5.53% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -13.11% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 3.93% | +1.03% |
Volatility
BOUT vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) is 7.26%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that BOUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOUT | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 11.62% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.22% | 19.19% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 25.76% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 24.73% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 26.28% | -3.32% |