BOSVX vs. ARSMX
BOSVX (Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund) and ARSMX (AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BOSVX returned 11.67%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for ARSMX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BOSVX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for ARSMX.
Performance
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOSVX achieves a 25.12% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, BOSVX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.
BOSVX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.03%
ARSMX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 9.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund | 25.12% | 9.78% | 4.21% | 18.18% | -4.27% | 48.03% | 0.83% | 13.90% | -17.15% | 5.91% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 10.07% | -0.83% | 12.42% | 14.48% | -8.62% | 23.41% | 1.71% | 34.82% | -6.44% | 15.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOSVX and ARSMX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BOSVX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOSVX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank
BOSVX
ARSMX
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOSVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.42 | 0.71 | +4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.24 | 1.64 | +15.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOSVX drawdown since its inception was -57.14%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSVX and ARSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOSVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.14% | -51.75% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.27% | -10.37% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -19.34% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -19.34% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -42.96% | -14.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.96% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -8.06% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.46% | -1.86% |
Volatility
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) is 3.47%, while AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that BOSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOSVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.08% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 9.15% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 14.37% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 17.70% | +4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 19.51% | +5.46% |
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOSVX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOSVX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison
BOSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 3.89% | 4.85% | 5.86% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 8.60% | 15.66% | 8.03% | 17.82% |
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund | 7.98% | 9.99% | 9.71% | 8.55% | 21.96% | 4.12% | 1.21% | 0.99% | 10.36% | 6.66% | 0.89% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOSVX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARSMX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to BOSVX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOSVX dropped -57.14% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.
BOSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOSVX and ARSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer