BOND vs. WCPB
BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) and WCPB (Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOND charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCPB.
Performance
BOND vs. WCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOND achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than WCPB's 1.35% return.
BOND
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
WCPB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOND vs. WCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.76% | 3.36% |
WCPB Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF | 1.35% | 3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOND and WCPB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOND vs. WCPB — Risk / Return Rank
BOND
WCPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOND vs. WCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF (WCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOND | WCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOND vs. WCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOND drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, which is greater than WCPB's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND and WCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOND | WCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -2.64% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.63% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -0.57% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility
BOND vs. WCPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOND | WCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 3.85% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 3.85% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 3.85% | +1.25% |
BOND vs. WCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOND has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than WCPB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOND vs. WCPB - Dividend Comparison
BOND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than WCPB's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
WCPB Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF | 3.58% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BOND and WCPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WCPB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WCPB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BOND.
BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.58% for WCPB.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Weitz. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BOND and 0.45% for WCPB.
Find the right allocation for BOND and WCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer