BOND vs. MINT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT).
BOND and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOND is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 1, 2012. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.
Performance
BOND vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOND vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | -0.02% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 0.08% | 4.76% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 0.91% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOND achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BOND has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 2.24%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.67% annualized return.
BOND
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOND vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOND has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOND vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
BOND
MINT
BOND vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOND | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 12.67 | -11.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 24.74 | -23.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 9.74 | -8.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 28.46 | -26.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 234.85 | -230.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOND | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 12.67 | -11.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 5.75 | -5.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 2.84 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 2.42 | -1.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOND and MINT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BOND vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
BOND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than MINT's 4.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.18% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.48% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
BOND vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOND drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND and MINT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOND | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -4.62% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -0.16% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -2.42% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.71% | -4.62% | -15.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | 0.00% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -0.17% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.02% | +1.10% |
Volatility
BOND vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.08%. This indicates that BOND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOND | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 0.08% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 0.18% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72% | 0.36% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 0.58% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 0.95% | +4.12% |