PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOEG vs. RDTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOEG vs. RDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly higher than RDTL's -50.79% return.


BOEG

1D
6.29%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
-8.79%
6M
4.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDTL

1D
17.12%
1M
9.34%
YTD
-50.79%
6M
-48.63%
1Y
35.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. RDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and RDTL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOEG vs. RDTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEG

RDTL
RDTL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. RDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BOEG vs. RDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOEGRDTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.01

-0.03

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. RDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum RDTL drawdown of -85.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and RDTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOEGRDTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-85.21%

+38.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.52%

-70.05%

+38.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.11%

-43.89%

+24.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.12%

Volatility

BOEG vs. RDTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOEGRDTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.57%

130.66%

-67.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.57%

142.11%

-78.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.57%

142.11%

-78.54%

BOEG vs. RDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOEG vs. RDTL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOEG nor RDTL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BOEG and RDTL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.

BOEG and RDTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 1.50% for RDTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOEG and RDTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer