BOEG vs. CRWL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and CRWL (GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRWL.

Performance

BOEG vs. CRWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly lower than CRWL's 90.19% return.

BOEG

• 1D: 6.29%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: -8.79%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWL

• 1D: -8.04%
• 1M: 116.13%
• YTD: 90.19%
• 6M: 56.07%
• 1Y: 66.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. CRWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-8.79%	6.85%
CRWL GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF	90.19%	-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and CRWL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

BOEG vs. CRWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWL

CRWL Risk / Return Rank: 24
CRWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CRWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CRWL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CRWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CRWL Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. CRWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOEG	CRWL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.76	-0.81

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. CRWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum CRWL drawdown of -64.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and CRWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOEG	CRWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.47%	-64.99%	+18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-64.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.52%	-16.13%	-15.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.11%	-24.72%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	32.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOEG	CRWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	32.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	74.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.57%	89.85%	-26.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.57%	95.88%	-32.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.57%	95.88%	-32.31%

BOEG vs. CRWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CRWL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOEG vs. CRWL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOEG nor CRWL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOEG and CRWL in my portfolio?

BOEG and CRWL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOEG or CRWL?

On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOEG or CRWL?

BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOEG or CRWL?

BOEG and CRWL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BOEG and CRWL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 1.50% for CRWL.