BOBP vs. TDTF
BOBP (CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF) and TDTF (FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BOBP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while TDTF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOBP returned 34.52% vs 5.07% for TDTF. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOBP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TDTF.
Performance
BOBP vs. TDTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than TDTF's 1.52% return.
BOBP
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 6M
- 24.49%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDTF
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
BOBP vs. TDTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF | 24.96% | 8.50% |
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 1.52% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOBP and TDTF is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOBP vs. TDTF — Risk / Return Rank
BOBP
TDTF
BOBP vs. TDTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOBP | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.22 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | 10.66 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOBP | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.67 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.89 | 0.47 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
BOBP vs. TDTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, which is greater than TDTF's maximum drawdown of -12.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and TDTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOBP | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -12.02% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -1.58% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -2.91% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 0.48% | +2.47% |
Volatility
BOBP vs. TDTF - Volatility Comparison
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTF) at 0.73%. This indicates that BOBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOBP | TDTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 0.73% | +6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.31% | 1.97% | +14.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 3.06% | +15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 5.69% | +12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 5.07% | +13.20% |
BOBP vs. TDTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TDTF's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOBP vs. TDTF - Dividend Comparison
BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than TDTF's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF | 2.65% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDTF FlexShares iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.71% | 4.58% | 3.98% | 3.97% | 7.60% | 4.55% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 2.60% | 2.20% | 1.51% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOBP and TDTF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOBP has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to TDTF (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -13.06% vs TDTF's -12.02%.
On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 34.52% vs 5.07% for TDTF. On fees, TDTF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TDTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 34.52% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDTF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.
TDTF has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.65% for BOBP.
BOBP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDTF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while TDTF tracks iBoxx 5-Year Target Duration TIPS. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 0.18% for TDTF.
BOBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOBP and TDTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer