BOBP vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BOBP (CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOBP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOBP returned 34.52% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. BOBP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

BOBP vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

BOBP

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 9.07%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 6M: 24.49%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOBP vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	24.96%	8.50%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and OILK is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025	-0.22

BOBP vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOBP	OILK
Technology	40.7%	-
Industrials	32.0%	-
Basic Materials	10.9%	-
Utilities	4.7%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BOBP vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOBP

BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 57
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOBP vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOBP	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.06	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.59	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.42	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	6.91	+4.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOBP vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOBP and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOBP	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.06	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.89	0.12	+1.78

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOBP	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.06%	-83.76%	+70.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-17.35%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.66%	+3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-32.61%	+30.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	8.56%	-5.61%

Volatility

BOBP vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) is 7.11%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that BOBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOBP	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.11%	10.44%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.31%	23.26%	-6.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	28.75%	-10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.27%	30.12%	-11.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.27%	35.97%	-17.70%

BOBP vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOBP vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	2.65%	3.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOBP and OILK in my portfolio?

BOBP and OILK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOBP or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to BOBP (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -13.06% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, BOBP or OILK?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 34.52% for BOBP. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOBP or OILK?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOBP or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOBP or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 2.65% for BOBP.

What is the main difference between BOBP and OILK?

BOBP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.