PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOBP vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOBP vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.


BOBP

1D
0.43%
1M
9.07%
YTD
24.96%
6M
24.49%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWET

1D
4.26%
1M
9.15%
YTD
875.88%
6M
735.56%
1Y
1,800.91%
3Y*
129.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOBP vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BOBP
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF
24.96%8.50%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
875.88%65.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and BWET is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.02

BOBP vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOBP
BWET

Technology

40.7%

-

Industrials

32.0%

-

Basic Materials

10.9%

-

Utilities

4.7%

-

Communication Services

3.9%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%

-

Financial Services

-

8.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

BOBP
40.7%
BWET

-

Industrials

BOBP
32.0%
BWET

-

Basic Materials

BOBP
10.9%
BWET

-

Utilities

BOBP
4.7%
BWET

-

Communication Services

BOBP
3.9%
BWET

-

Energy

BOBP
3.7%
BWET

-

Consumer Defensive

BOBP
2.8%
BWET

-

Consumer Cyclical

BOBP
1.4%
BWET

-

Financial Services

BOBP

-

BWET
8.6%

Healthcare

BOBP

-

BWET

-

Real Estate

BOBP

-

BWET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOBP vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOBP vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOBPBWETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.96

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

59.51

-56.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

158.07

-146.32

BOBP vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOBP and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOBPBWETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

18.57

-16.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

1.90

-0.01

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOBPBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-56.90%

+43.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-30.64%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.29%

+11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-24.09%

+22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

11.51%

-8.56%

Volatility

BOBP vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) is 7.11%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that BOBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOBPBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

33.96%

-26.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

88.49%

-72.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

98.35%

-79.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

70.45%

-52.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

70.45%

-52.18%

BOBP vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOBP vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOBP and BWET have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to BOBP (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -13.06% vs BWET's -56.90%.

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs 34.52% for BOBP. On fees, BOBP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BOBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs 34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOBP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

BOBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

BOBP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BWET is Commodities. BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 3.50% for BWET.

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOBP and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer