PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOBP vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOBP vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


BOBP

1D
0.43%
1M
9.07%
YTD
24.96%
6M
24.49%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOBP vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and AFOS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOBP vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOBP vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOBPAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

BOBP vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOBPAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

4.35

-2.46

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOBPAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-11.52%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-1.37%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

BOBP vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOBPAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

20.19%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

20.19%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

20.19%

-1.92%

BOBP vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOBP vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOBP and AFOS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

BOBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOBP and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer