BOAT vs. TYLD
BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOAT is a Transportation Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. BOAT is passively managed, while TYLD is actively managed. Over the past year, BOAT returned 49.09% vs 4.06% for TYLD. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BOAT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.
Performance
BOAT vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOAT achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than TYLD's 1.50% return.
BOAT
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 29.73%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 49.09%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOAT vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 29.73% | 22.77% | -0.86% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 1.50% | 4.05% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOAT and TYLD is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOAT vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank
BOAT
TYLD
BOAT vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOAT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 2.55 | -1.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 34.31 | -30.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 125.35 | -112.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOAT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 5.42 | -2.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 2.53 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
BOAT vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOAT and TYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOAT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -1.06% | -32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -0.12% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | 0.00% | -6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -0.11% | -9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 0.03% | +3.72% |
Volatility
BOAT vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) at 0.26%. This indicates that BOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOAT | TYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.60% | 0.26% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 0.55% | +14.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 0.75% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 1.77% | +23.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 1.77% | +23.35% |
BOAT vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOAT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOAT vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison
BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than TYLD's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 6.32% | 8.08% | 13.89% | 13.65% | 13.57% | 1.36% |
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF | 4.69% | 4.38% | 4.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOAT and TYLD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOAT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to TYLD (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOAT dropped -33.94% vs TYLD's -1.06%.
On 1-year performance, BOAT leads with 49.09% vs 4.06% for TYLD. On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 49.09% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 4.69% for TYLD.
They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BOAT and 0.59% for TYLD.
TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOAT and TYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer