PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNXG.DE is traded in EUR, while BCHN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCHN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNXG.DE achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly lower than BCHN.L's 27.25% return.


BNXG.DE

1D
-2.38%
1M
9.75%
YTD
25.60%
6M
16.57%
1Y
57.31%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

BCHN.L

1D
-2.26%
1M
11.31%
YTD
27.25%
6M
16.79%
1Y
58.52%
3Y*
42.08%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BNXG.DE
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc
25.60%30.08%24.44%61.89%-49.28%37.62%73.64%15.23%
BCHN.L
Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF
27.25%28.23%25.05%61.40%-49.05%33.25%80.24%14.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BNXG.DE and BCHN.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019

0.90

The correlation between BNXG.DE and BCHN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNXG.DE
BNXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BCHN.L
BCHN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNXG.DEBCHN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.88

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

3.83

+0.06

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNXG.DE and BCHN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNXG.DEBCHN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.66

0.00

Drawdowns

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, roughly equal to the maximum BCHN.L drawdown of -57.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNXG.DE and BCHN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNXG.DEBCHN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-57.55%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-31.01%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.54%

-38.62%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.23%

-57.55%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-4.43%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-21.02%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.69%

15.25%

-0.56%

Volatility

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) is 9.95%, while Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that BNXG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNXG.DEBCHN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

11.13%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.00%

26.37%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.88%

40.27%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.22%

37.90%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.37%

35.90%

-0.53%

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BNXG.DE and BCHN.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

BNXG.DE vs. BCHN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNXG.DE nor BCHN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BNXG.DE and BCHN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNXG.DE and BCHN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity, while BCHN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNXG.DE and BCHN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer