PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNUEX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
-4.27%29.10%6.62%15.40%-14.08%3.24%12.95%22.61%-16.73%31.21%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
2.45%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNUEX achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BNUEX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 8.05%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.


BNUEX

1D
1.00%
1M
-9.15%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
1.22%
1Y
17.82%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
8.05%

PCGTX

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
2.45%
6M
4.22%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNUEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNUEX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNUEX
BNUEX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BNUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BNUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.39

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

2.24

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.45

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.67

7.00

-2.33

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNUEX and PCGTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.39

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.04

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.30

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.97

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between BNUEX and PCGTX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

BNUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than PCGTX's 4.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
2.03%1.94%1.64%0.85%14.17%9.87%1.30%1.43%1.99%1.38%2.37%1.31%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.44%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%

Drawdowns

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNUEX drawdown since its inception was -61.03%, which is greater than PCGTX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNUEX and PCGTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.03%

-19.34%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-3.10%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-19.20%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-19.34%

-16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-1.85%

-7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.10%

-1.86%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.09%

+2.21%

Volatility

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) at 2.13%. This indicates that BNUEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

2.13%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

4.13%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

6.23%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

7.10%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

5.35%

+10.69%