PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNUEX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNUEX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than PCGTX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BNUEX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


BNUEX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.90%
YTD
6.48%
6M
9.35%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.70%

PCGTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.02%
6M
3.30%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
6.48%29.10%6.62%15.40%-14.08%3.24%12.95%22.61%-16.73%31.21%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
3.02%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BNUEX and PCGTX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.01

Over the past year, BNUEX and PCGTX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNUEX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNUEX
BNUEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BNUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BNUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNUEXPCGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.33

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

11.48

-2.98

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNUEX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.81

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.05

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.29

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.96

-0.64

Drawdowns

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNUEX drawdown since its inception was -61.03%, which is greater than PCGTX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNUEX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.03%

-19.34%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-3.09%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-7.94%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.49%

-19.20%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-19.34%

-16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.31%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-1.85%

-10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

0.92%

+1.50%

Volatility

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) at 1.85%. This indicates that BNUEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNUEXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

1.85%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

4.40%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

5.67%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

7.16%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

5.39%

+10.64%

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNUEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNUEX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

BNUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
1.82%1.94%1.64%0.85%14.17%9.87%1.30%1.43%1.99%1.38%2.37%1.31%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.48%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNUEX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNUEX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to PCGTX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNUEX dropped -61.03% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNUEX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer