PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNUEX vs. PCSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNUEX achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than PCSGX's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BNUEX has underperformed PCSGX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while PCSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


BNUEX

1D
1.61%
1M
2.36%
6M
7.18%
YTD
9.72%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
8.97%
ALL TIME*
5.83%

PCSGX

1D
2.12%
1M
-4.04%
6M
13.97%
YTD
13.18%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
10.60%
ALL TIME*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
9.72%29.10%6.62%15.40%-14.08%3.24%12.95%22.61%-16.73%31.21%
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
13.18%2.00%12.20%15.89%-26.58%14.91%38.85%24.05%0.33%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BNUEX and PCSGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.57

The correlation between BNUEX and PCSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNUEX vs. PCSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNUEX
BNUEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BNUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BNUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PCSGX
PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNUEXPCSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.53

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

5.26

+3.81

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the PCSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNUEX and PCSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNUEX drawdown since its inception was -61.03%, which is greater than PCSGX's maximum drawdown of -56.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNUEX and PCSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNUEXPCSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.03%

-56.32%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-13.48%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-27.64%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.38%

-37.48%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-39.35%

+3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.02%

+6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-12.35%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.82%

-1.36%

Volatility

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) is 3.21%, while PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that BNUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNUEXPCSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

5.42%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

15.49%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

20.54%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

23.03%

-7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

22.87%

-7.14%

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNUEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNUEX vs. PCSGX - Dividend Comparison

BNUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than PCSGX's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNUEX
UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund
1.77%1.94%1.64%0.85%14.17%9.87%1.30%1.43%1.99%1.38%2.37%1.31%
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
5.66%6.40%3.06%0.00%0.00%45.92%6.50%15.70%20.15%5.56%0.00%25.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNUEX and PCSGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCSGX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to BNUEX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNUEX dropped -61.03% vs PCSGX's -56.32%.

BNUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNUEX and PCSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer