BNUEX vs. PCEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX).
BNUEX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 31, 1993. PCEMX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995.
Performance
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNUEX UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund | -4.27% | 29.10% | 6.62% | 15.40% | -14.08% | 3.24% | 12.95% | 22.61% | -16.73% | 31.21% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 0.24% | 36.75% | 4.15% | 10.33% | -18.97% | -1.79% | 20.13% | 19.01% | -16.42% | 34.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNUEX achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than PCEMX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BNUEX has outperformed PCEMX with an annualized return of 8.05%, while PCEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.49% annualized return.
BNUEX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
PCEMX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -14.42%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNUEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEMX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BNUEX vs. PCEMX — Risk / Return Rank
BNUEX
PCEMX
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNUEX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.82 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.31 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 2.34 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | 8.95 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNUEX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.82 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.24 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.23 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BNUEX and PCEMX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Dividend Comparison
BNUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than PCEMX's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNUEX UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.64% | 0.85% | 14.17% | 9.87% | 1.30% | 1.43% | 1.99% | 1.38% | 2.37% | 1.31% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 4.89% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 2.52% | 11.70% | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.84% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNUEX drawdown since its inception was -61.03%, smaller than the maximum PCEMX drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNUEX and PCEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNUEX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.03% | -65.32% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -14.42% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.49% | -36.66% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -39.17% | +3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.15% | -14.42% | +5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.10% | -20.98% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.82% | -0.52% |
Volatility
BNUEX vs. PCEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund (BNUEX) is 5.43%, while PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that BNUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BNUEX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 8.92% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 13.34% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 18.15% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 17.07% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 17.29% | -1.25% |