PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNQP.DE is traded in EUR, while ESEA.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESEA.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNQP.DE achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than ESEA.DE's 11.31% return.


BNQP.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
6.09%
YTD
12.82%
6M
23.25%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

ESEA.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.29%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BNQP.DE
BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC
12.82%20.92%16.44%2.18%-3.18%31.64%12.34%6.66%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.32%4.18%32.44%22.22%-14.52%41.11%7.15%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BNQP.DE and ESEA.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNQP.DE
BNQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ESEA.DE
ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNQP.DEESEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

3.53

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.92

12.07

+4.85

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNQP.DE and ESEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNQP.DEESEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.04

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.90

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Drawdowns

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNQP.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum ESEA.DE drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNQP.DE and ESEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNQP.DEESEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-33.64%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-7.19%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-22.79%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-22.79%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.41%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-4.87%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.10%

+0.39%

Volatility

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that BNQP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNQP.DEESEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

3.03%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

8.65%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

12.45%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

15.91%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

17.81%

+0.97%

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNQP.DE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ESEA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNQP.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

BNQP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BNQP.DE
BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.06%0.76%0.65%0.00%1.08%0.64%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNQP.DE and ESEA.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNQP.DE.

BNQP.DE is categorized as Metals, while ESEA.DE is S&P 500. BNQP.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper, while ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BNQP.DE and 0.15% for ESEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNQP.DE and ESEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer