PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNOV vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNOV vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNOV achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.95% return.


BNOV

1D
0.78%
1M
0.65%
6M
7.01%
YTD
8.04%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.78%

JANB

1D
0.48%
1M
0.80%
6M
6.06%
YTD
6.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$493.09K$442.48K$1.23M
$172.70K$156.00K$568.29K

BNOV vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNOV and JANB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNOV vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNOV
BNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNOV vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNOVJANBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

BNOV vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNOV vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNOV drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNOV and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNOVJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.66%

-6.52%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.06%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-1.02%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

BNOV vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNOVJANBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.10%

7.38%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

7.38%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

7.38%

+6.60%

BNOV vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNOV vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNOV nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BNOV and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BNOV.

BNOV and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BNOV and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNOV and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer