BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE
BNKS.L (iShares S&P U.S. Banks) and CSTA.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while CSTA.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNKS.L returned 4.76%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for CSTA.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CSTA.DE.
Performance
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BNKS.L is traded in USD, while CSTA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKS.L achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than CSTA.DE's 25.35% return.
BNKS.L
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CSTA.DE
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 25.35%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks | 3.61% | 20.45% | 28.55% | -3.74% | -18.79% | 39.71% | -12.04% | 36.28% | -24.32% |
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 25.35% | 16.79% | 0.51% | 36.69% | -31.77% | 23.72% | 25.37% | 35.04% | -18.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKS.L and CSTA.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2018 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BNKS.L
CSTA.DE
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKS.L | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.50 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.21 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKS.L | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.14 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.29 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CSTA.DE drawdown of -49.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKS.L and CSTA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKS.L | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.35% | -49.87% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.88% | -18.22% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.47% | -23.57% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.15% | -49.87% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.58% | 0.00% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -10.64% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 6.50% | -0.38% |
Volatility
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) is 6.48%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that BNKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSTA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKS.L | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 8.23% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 19.93% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 23.98% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 27.39% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.51% | 25.17% | +6.34% |
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKS.L vs. CSTA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNKS.L nor CSTA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.26% | 1.49% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKS.L and CSTA.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSTA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSTA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNKS.L.
BNKS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while CSTA.DE is Technology Equities. BNKS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while CSTA.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNKS.L and 0.30% for CSTA.DE.
Find the right allocation for BNKS.L and CSTA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer