PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.71%55.98%29.92%9.73%
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
-0.96%60.13%28.78%9.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than EBNK.TO's -0.96% return.


BNKL.TO

1D
1.52%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
2.71%
6M
18.41%
1Y
68.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EBNK.TO

1D
2.78%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKL.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EBNK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKL.TO
BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EBNK.TO
EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKL.TOEBNK.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.25

1.08

+3.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.18

1.66

+3.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.23

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.35

1.80

+4.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.43

7.34

+17.08

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.25, which is higher than the EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKL.TO and EBNK.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKL.TOEBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25

1.08

+3.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.27

0.83

+1.44

Correlation

The correlation between BNKL.TO and EBNK.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than EBNK.TO's 11.47% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.42%3.40%4.39%2.79%0.00%
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
11.47%11.05%12.56%7.32%7.52%

Drawdowns

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum EBNK.TO drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and EBNK.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKL.TOEBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-31.02%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-17.39%

+6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

-7.81%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-7.56%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

4.26%

-1.45%

Volatility

BNKL.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) is 6.94%, while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that BNKL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNKL.TOEBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

9.79%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

15.29%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

29.15%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

27.06%

-11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

27.06%

-11.34%