PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNKE.L is traded in GBP, while IMIB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMIB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKE.L achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than IMIB.L's 11.33% return.


BNKE.L

1D
0.77%
1M
6.68%
YTD
4.63%
6M
11.03%
1Y
45.15%
3Y*
46.04%
5Y*
29.25%
10Y*

IMIB.L

1D
0.02%
1M
2.98%
YTD
11.33%
6M
14.60%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BNKE.L
Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
4.63%99.94%25.19%27.75%6.62%31.33%-18.12%2.40%
IMIB.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
11.33%38.08%8.33%25.41%-7.28%14.64%-0.17%-0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKE.L and IMIB.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019

0.78

The correlation between BNKE.L and IMIB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BNKE.L
IMIB.L

Financial Services

100.0%
45.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Communication Services

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

8.8%

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

17.2%

Financial Services

BNKE.L
100.0%
IMIB.L
45.2%

Basic Materials

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
0.6%

Communication Services

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
0.5%

Energy

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
8.8%

Healthcare

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
1.1%

Industrials

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
10.8%

Real Estate

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
0.3%

Technology

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
4.6%

Utilities

BNKE.L

-

IMIB.L
17.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKE.L
BNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IMIB.L
IMIB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKE.LIMIB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.78

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

9.17

-0.45

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKE.L and IMIB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKE.LIMIB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.87

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.83

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.11

+0.64

Drawdowns

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKE.L drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, smaller than the maximum IMIB.L drawdown of -65.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKE.L and IMIB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKE.LIMIB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.52%

-65.01%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.66%

-10.28%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-15.58%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.21%

-26.95%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.64%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-31.09%

+20.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

3.12%

+2.05%

Volatility

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) at 4.94%. This indicates that BNKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMIB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKE.LIMIB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.94%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

12.23%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

15.32%

+7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

18.12%

+7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.62%

19.71%

+9.91%

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKE.L vs. IMIB.L - Dividend Comparison

BNKE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNKE.L
Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMIB.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.04%0.04%0.05%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.01%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNKE.L and IMIB.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNKE.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNKE.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IMIB.L.

BNKE.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while IMIB.L is Europe Equities. BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IMIB.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BNKE.L and 0.35% for IMIB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKE.L and IMIB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer