PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IMIB.L vs. CS1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L).

IMIB.L and CS1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMIB.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. It was launched on Jul 6, 2007. CS1.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 16, 2008. Both IMIB.L and CS1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMIB.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		2.09%43.79%13.17%30.54%-3.58%18.30%1.46%24.85%-12.68%20.95%
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)		1.68%62.63%14.12%24.14%4.89%0.59%-7.48%8.06%-11.27%15.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMIB.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than CS1.L's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IMIB.L has outperformed CS1.L with an annualized return of 14.75%, while CS1.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.85% annualized return.

IMIB.L

1D
3.10%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.09%
6M
7.69%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
18.52%
10Y*
14.75%

CS1.L

1D
2.83%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
1.68%
6M
14.78%
1Y
42.13%
3Y*
27.88%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)

Often compared with IMIB.L:
IMIB.L vs. ESIF.LIMIB.L vs. SPMOIMIB.L vs. VOOIMIB.L vs. X7PP.LIMIB.L vs. BNKE.LIMIB.L vs. PSRE.LIMIB.L vs. EEIP.L
Often compared with CS1.L:
CS1.L vs. VOOCS1.L vs. ^GSPCCS1.L vs. WDEP.LCS1.L vs. CSWG.LCS1.L vs. EDIV.LCS1.L vs. PRUK.LCS1.L vs. FEQD.L

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMIB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CS1.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

IMIB.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)

Return for Risk

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IMIB.L
IMIB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMIB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
CS1.L
CS1.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CS1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CS1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IMIB.LCS1.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

2.41

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.94

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

4.04

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.72

14.02

-4.31

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the CS1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMIB.L and CS1.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IMIB.LCS1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.41

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.21

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.64

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.47

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between IMIB.L and CS1.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Dividend Comparison

IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while CS1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMIB.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		3.76%3.83%4.54%3.77%3.91%3.15%1.44%3.41%3.25%2.29%2.82%2.15%
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMIB.L drawdown since its inception was -59.82%, which is greater than CS1.L's maximum drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIB.L and CS1.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IMIB.LCS1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.82%

-38.87%

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-10.34%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

-18.82%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-38.87%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-5.21%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-10.44%

-8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.98%

+0.06%

Volatility

IMIB.L vs. CS1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) have volatilities of 6.92% and 7.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IMIB.LCS1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

7.25%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

12.54%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

17.41%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

16.60%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

18.47%

+1.17%