BNDY vs. MEDX

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

BNDY (Horizon Core Bond ETF) and MEDX (Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDY is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Horizon, while MEDX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BNDY returned 6.78% vs 40.17% for MEDX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDY charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MEDX.

Performance

BNDY vs. MEDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDY achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than MEDX's 13.53% return.

BNDY

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEDX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 9.32%
• 6M: 12.47%
• YTD: 13.53%
• 1Y: 40.17%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDY vs. MEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF	0.82%	5.21%
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	13.53%	22.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDY and MEDX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

BNDY vs. MEDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDY

BNDY Risk / Return Rank: 45
BNDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BNDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BNDY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BNDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BNDY Martin Ratio Rank: 50

MEDX

MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 80
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDY vs. MEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNDY	MEDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.15	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	3.32	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	3.83	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	10.53	-3.32

BNDY vs. MEDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the MEDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDY and MEDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNDY vs. MEDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDY drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum MEDX drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDY and MEDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDY	MEDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-23.10%	+19.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.93%	-10.54%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	0.00%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-6.59%	+5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	3.83%	-2.89%

Volatility

BNDY vs. MEDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) is 1.82%, while Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that BNDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNDY	MEDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	6.04%	-4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.24%	14.33%	-10.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	18.75%	-13.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.11%	17.15%	-12.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.11%	17.15%	-12.04%

BNDY vs. MEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than MEDX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNDY vs. MEDX - Dividend Comparison

BNDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than MEDX's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF	5.87%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	1.08%	1.23%	1.92%	4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNDY and MEDX in my portfolio?

BNDY and MEDX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNDY or MEDX?

MEDX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to BNDY (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDY dropped -3.93% vs MEDX's -23.10%.

Which ETF is better, BNDY or MEDX?

On 1-year performance, MEDX leads with 40.17% vs 6.78% for BNDY. On fees, BNDY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, BNDY has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNDY or MEDX?

Over the 1-year period, MEDX has performed better with a 40.17% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNDY or MEDX?

BNDY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNDY or MEDX?

BNDY has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 1.08% for MEDX.

What is the main difference between BNDY and MEDX?

BNDY is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while MEDX is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BNDY and 0.85% for MEDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.