PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDY vs. EDGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDY vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BNDY having a 0.87% return and EDGF slightly higher at 0.90%.


BNDY

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDGF

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDY vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
0.87%5.34%
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
0.90%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDY and EDGF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDY vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDY

EDGF
EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDY vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNDY vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDYEDGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.98

+0.40

Drawdowns

BNDY vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDY drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDY and EDGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDYEDGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-1.62%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.07%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-0.46%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

BNDY vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDYEDGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

1.94%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

2.35%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

2.35%

+2.66%

BNDY vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDY vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

BNDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
4.83%1.89%0.00%
EDGF
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.45%3.61%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDY and EDGF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

BNDY has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BNDY and 0.79% for EDGF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDY and EDGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer