BNDX vs. DFGP
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP).
BNDX and DFGP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013. DFGP is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023.
Performance
BNDX vs. DFGP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BNDX vs. DFGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.02% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 4.81% |
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF | 0.01% | 5.89% | 3.71% | 6.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than DFGP's 0.01% return.
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
DFGP
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNDX vs. DFGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFGP's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BNDX vs. DFGP — Risk / Return Rank
BNDX
DFGP
BNDX vs. DFGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNDX | DFGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.03 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.42 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 5.50 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDX | DFGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.03 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.45 | -0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDX and DFGP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BNDX vs. DFGP - Dividend Comparison
BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than DFGP's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF | 3.36% | 3.45% | 4.51% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BNDX vs. DFGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, which is greater than DFGP's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and DFGP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDX | DFGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -3.24% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -3.24% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -2.02% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -0.73% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.84% | -0.12% |
Volatility
BNDX vs. DFGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.74%, while Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BNDX | DFGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 2.16% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 2.72% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 4.26% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 4.63% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 4.63% | -0.58% |