PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 1.52%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.52%
ALL TIME*
2.28%

DBO

1D
-5.53%
1M
17.71%
6M
53.16%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.29M$189.02M$229.54M
$11.34M$10.71M$13.49M

BNDX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.62%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
66.72%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and DBO is -0.53, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

-0.16

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BNDX and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.16 to -0.53, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNDX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.86

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

5.64

-4.57

BNDX vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-90.18%

+73.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-27.73%

+24.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-28.20%

+25.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-37.68%

+21.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-61.69%

+45.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-56.13%

+54.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-62.20%

+59.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

9.16%

-8.01%

Volatility

BNDX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.17%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

18.99%

-17.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

34.30%

-31.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

38.86%

-35.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

33.43%

-28.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

32.24%

-28.15%

BNDX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.55%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.11%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and DBO have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to BNDX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.43% vs 1.52% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (Hedged), while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer