BNDW vs. EUNA.AS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS).

BNDW and EUNA.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018. EUNA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. Both BNDW and EUNA.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	0.09%	5.02%	2.42%	7.18%	-12.88%	-2.10%	6.22%	8.37%	1.21%
EUNA.AS iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF	0.00%	25.50%	1.39%	18.75%	-8.12%	18.02%	1.95%	24.00%	-7.51%

Different Trading Currencies

BNDW is traded in USD, while EUNA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

BNDW

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: —

EUNA.AS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDW has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNA.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.

EUNA.AS

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF

BNDW

Vanguard Total World Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 47
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) and iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNDW	EUNA.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNDW	EUNA.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between BNDW and EUNA.AS is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BNDW vs. EUNA.AS - Dividend Comparison

BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than EUNA.AS's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.18%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUNA.AS iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF	2.24%	2.52%	2.68%	2.56%	2.62%	2.22%	2.42%	2.96%	3.51%	3.24%	3.29%	3.05%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDW	EUNA.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BNDW	EUNA.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.92%	—	—