BNDI vs. MBS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BNDI (Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BNDI returned 5.62% vs 5.63% for MBS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNDI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.

Performance

BNDI vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDI achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than MBS's 0.91% return.

BNDI

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 0.72%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.54%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDI vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF	0.97%	7.95%	3.64%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.91%	8.13%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDI and MBS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024	0.64

The correlation between BNDI and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BNDI vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDI

BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 51
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 74
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDI vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BNDI	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.05	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	3.11	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.57	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	7.30	-0.01

BNDI vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDI and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BNDI vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDI drawdown since its inception was -7.25%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDI and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDI	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.25%	-4.09%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.75%	-2.20%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-1.18%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-1.02%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	0.77%	0.00%

Volatility

BNDI vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.79%. This indicates that BNDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNDI	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	0.79%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.38%	2.10%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.17%	2.76%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.16%	3.94%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.16%	3.94%	+2.22%

BNDI vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNDI vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

BNDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than MBS's 5.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF	5.86%	5.69%	5.54%	5.17%	1.68%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.67%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNDI and MBS in my portfolio?

BNDI and MBS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNDI or MBS?

BNDI has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to MBS (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDI dropped -7.25% vs MBS's -4.09%.

Which ETF is better, BNDI or MBS?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 5.63% vs 5.62% for BNDI. On fees, MBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNDI or MBS?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 5.63% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNDI or MBS?

MBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BNDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNDI or MBS?

BNDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 5.67% for MBS.

What is the main difference between BNDI and MBS?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BNDI and 0.49% for MBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.