PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDI vs. ITWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDI vs. ITWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDI achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than ITWO's 20.44% return.


BNDI

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.56%
6M
0.83%
YTD
1.13%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.73%

ITWO

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.78%
6M
11.95%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDI vs. ITWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
1.13%7.95%-2.22%
ITWO
Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF
20.44%14.25%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDI and ITWO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDI vs. ITWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ITWO
ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDI vs. ITWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDIITWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.27

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

10.94

-3.81

BNDI vs. ITWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ITWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDI and ITWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDI vs. ITWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDI drawdown since its inception was -7.25%, smaller than the maximum ITWO drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDI and ITWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDIITWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-24.77%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-9.79%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-2.51%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-4.88%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.92%

-2.14%

Volatility

BNDI vs. ITWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) is 1.12%, while Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that BNDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDIITWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

3.64%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

13.85%

-10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

18.88%

-14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

20.33%

-14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

20.33%

-14.18%

BNDI vs. ITWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ITWO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDI vs. ITWO - Dividend Comparison

BNDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than ITWO's 7.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
6.36%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%
ITWO
Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF
7.32%12.12%4.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDI and ITWO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITWO has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to BNDI (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDI dropped -7.25% vs ITWO's -24.77%.

On 1-year performance, ITWO leads with 31.91% vs 5.57% for BNDI. On fees, ITWO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITWO has performed better with a 31.91% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITWO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BNDI.

ITWO has the higher dividend yield at 7.32%, compared with 6.36% for BNDI.

BNDI is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while ITWO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BNDI and 0.55% for ITWO.

ITWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDI and ITWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer