PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDD vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDD vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDD vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.22%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-17.48%5.54%
SHV
iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF
0.81%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDD achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 0.81% return.


BNDD

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
-4.63%
5Y*
10Y*

SHV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
2.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDD vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDD has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNDD vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDD vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) and iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDDSHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

19.56

-19.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

153.08

-153.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

55.01

-54.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

441.03

-441.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.56

2,478.85

-2,479.42

BNDD vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDD and SHV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDDSHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

19.56

-19.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

11.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

7.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

4.43

-4.79

Correlation

The correlation between BNDD and SHV is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNDD vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

BNDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than SHV's 3.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.64%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHV
iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF
3.98%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%

Drawdowns

BNDD vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDD drawdown since its inception was -30.87%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDD and SHV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDDSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-0.45%

-30.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-0.01%

-10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.28%

0.00%

-27.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-0.03%

-19.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

0.00%

+7.26%

Volatility

BNDD vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that BNDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDDSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

0.05%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

0.13%

+7.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

0.21%

+12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

0.29%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.55%

0.28%

+13.27%