PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDC vs. JUCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDC vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than JUCY's 3.13% return.


BNDC

1D
0.13%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.16%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*

JUCY

1D
0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.92%
1Y
7.83%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDC vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
0.07%7.29%0.86%5.36%2.70%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
3.13%5.50%3.89%3.27%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and JUCY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDC vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

JUCY
JUCY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JUCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUCY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
JUCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUCY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDC vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDCJUCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

9.49

-8.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

36.42

-32.03

BNDC vs. JUCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the JUCY Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and JUCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDCJUCYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.27

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.40

-1.19

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than JUCY's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and JUCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDCJUCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-1.56%

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-0.83%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.30%

-1.56%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

0.00%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-0.32%

-7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

BNDC vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) at 0.50%. This indicates that BNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDCJUCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.50%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

2.14%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

3.47%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

3.32%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.05%

3.32%

+4.73%

BNDC vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDC vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than JUCY's 8.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.15%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
8.21%7.98%7.83%9.31%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDC and JUCY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDC has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to JUCY (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDC dropped -18.80% vs JUCY's -1.56%.

On 3-year performance, JUCY leads with 4.46% vs 3.76% for BNDC. On fees, BNDC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JUCY has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JUCY has performed better with a 4.46% return vs 3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JUCY.

JUCY has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 4.15% for BNDC.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNDC and 0.60% for JUCY.

JUCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDC and JUCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer