BNDC vs. FIBR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNDC (FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund) and FIBR (iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while FIBR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. BNDC is actively managed, while FIBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNDC returned -0.19%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for FIBR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNDC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FIBR.

Performance

BNDC vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than FIBR's 0.24% return.

BNDC

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 4.25%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: -0.19%
• 10Y*: —

FIBR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 6.74%
• 5Y*: 1.57%
• 10Y*: 2.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDC vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund	0.07%	7.29%	0.86%	5.36%	-13.54%	-2.01%	8.66%	9.57%	-1.49%	3.97%
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF	0.24%	8.32%	6.04%	8.22%	-13.57%	-1.00%	3.31%	10.03%	-0.93%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and FIBR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2016	0.66

The correlation between BNDC and FIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BNDC vs. FIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNDC	FIBR
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNDC vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDC

BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 30
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

FIBR

FIBR Risk / Return Rank: 39
FIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDC vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNDC	FIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.42	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.03	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	1.80	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	5.50	-1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNDC vs. FIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the FIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and FIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNDC	FIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.42	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.28	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.50	-0.29

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FIBR drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and FIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNDC	FIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-18.47%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	-2.99%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.30%	-3.08%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.60%	-18.47%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-1.61%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-3.27%	-4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.98%	-0.01%

Volatility

BNDC vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) is 1.23%, while iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that BNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNDC	FIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	1.40%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	3.11%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	3.80%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.07%	5.63%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.05%	4.95%	+3.10%

BNDC vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNDC vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than FIBR's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund	4.15%	4.16%	3.81%	3.19%	2.64%	1.72%	2.61%	2.89%	2.86%	2.50%	0.64%	0.00%
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF	4.61%	4.78%	5.04%	4.44%	3.27%	1.92%	2.57%	3.27%	3.61%	2.74%	2.92%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNDC and FIBR in my portfolio?

BNDC and FIBR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNDC or FIBR?

FIBR has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to BNDC (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDC dropped -18.80% vs FIBR's -18.47%.

Which ETF is better, BNDC or FIBR?

On 5-year performance, FIBR leads with 1.57% vs -0.19% for BNDC. On fees, FIBR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BNDC has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNDC or FIBR?

Over the 5-year period, FIBR has performed better with a 1.57% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNDC or FIBR?

FIBR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNDC or FIBR?

FIBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.15% for BNDC.

What is the main difference between BNDC and FIBR?

BNDC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FIBR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNDC and 0.25% for FIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.