BND vs. WMT
BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BND returned 1.53%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for WMT. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BND vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 1.53%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.62% annualized return.
BND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
BND vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.07% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 7.98% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND and WMT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | -0.05 |
The correlation between BND and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
BND
WMT
BND vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BND | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.53 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 5.02 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BND | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.02 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.04 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.91 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.64 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
BND vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -77.14% | +58.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -15.75% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | -21.93% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -25.74% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.58% | -25.74% | +7.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -10.71% | +8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -14.63% | +11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 4.79% | -3.89% |
Volatility
BND vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.20%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 10.26% | -9.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 18.59% | -15.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 23.72% | -20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 21.68% | -15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 21.73% | -16.20% |
Dividends
BND vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than WMT's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.81% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BND and WMT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs WMT's -77.14%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BND and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer