PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND vs. FISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND vs. FISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than FISMX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed FISMX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while FISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.


BND

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.58%

FISMX

1D
2.56%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
8.75%
6M
10.42%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. FISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.52%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
8.75%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and FISMX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

-0.03

The correlation between BND and FISMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND vs. FISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. FISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDFISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.48

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

5.19

-0.39

BND vs. FISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the FISMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and FISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BND vs. FISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum FISMX drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and FISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDFISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-60.94%

+42.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-10.71%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-12.70%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-31.07%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

-38.80%

+20.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-2.37%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-10.63%

+7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

3.04%

-2.12%

Volatility

BND vs. FISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.28%, while Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDFISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

4.94%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

10.81%

-8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

12.78%

-9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

13.67%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

14.08%

-8.55%

BND vs. FISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FISMX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BND vs. FISMX - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than FISMX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.29%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND and FISMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISMX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs FISMX's -60.94%.

FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND and FISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer