BND vs. EMC

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X. BND is passively managed, while EMC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BND returned 4.17%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for EMC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BND charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMC.

Performance

BND vs. EMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than EMC's 22.09% return.

BND

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.58%

EMC

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 6M: 24.45%
• 1Y: 34.55%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. EMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	0.52%	7.08%	1.38%	2.05%
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	22.09%	18.91%	3.75%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and EMC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023	0.20

Return for Risk

BND vs. EMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 37
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

EMC

EMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
EMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EMC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EMC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. EMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BND	EMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.46	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	2.06	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	2.32	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.81	8.27	-3.46

BND vs. EMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the EMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and EMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BND vs. EMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, roughly equal to the maximum EMC drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and EMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BND	EMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.58%	-18.38%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-13.89%	+11.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.92%	-18.38%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-4.11%	+1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-4.12%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	3.89%	-2.97%

Volatility

BND vs. EMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.28%, while Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BND	EMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	10.45%	-9.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	19.85%	-17.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75%	22.04%	-18.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	18.97%	-12.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	18.97%	-13.44%

BND vs. EMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EMC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BND vs. EMC - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than EMC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	3.96%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF	0.64%	0.78%	1.13%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BND and EMC in my portfolio?

BND and EMC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BND or EMC?

EMC has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs EMC's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, BND or EMC?

On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 15.25% vs 4.17% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BND or EMC?

Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 15.25% return vs 4.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BND or EMC?

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BND or EMC?

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.64% for EMC.

What is the main difference between BND and EMC?

BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while EMC is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.75% for EMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.