BN vs. HLT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BN (Brookfield Corporation) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. BN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BN returned 14.55%/yr vs 48.67%/yr for HLT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BN vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Corporation (BN) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BN has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 14.55%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.67% annualized return.

BN

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -6.05%
• YTD: -3.44%
• 6M: -4.46%
• 1Y: 13.31%
• 3Y*: 28.82%
• 5Y*: 11.64%
• 10Y*: 14.55%

HLT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 7.58%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 26.36%
• 1Y: 35.01%
• 3Y*: 34.37%
• 5Y*: 22.25%
• 10Y*: 48.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BN vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BN Brookfield Corporation	-3.44%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-34.80%	49.30%	8.99%	52.68%	-10.65%	33.82%
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.	18.69%	16.49%	36.11%	44.68%	-18.72%	40.20%	0.47%	55.48%	-9.40%	829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BN and HLT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.47

The correlation between BN and HLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap BN : $104.69B HLT : $79.03B
EPS BN : $0.56 HLT : $6.50
PE Ratio BN : 78.31 HLT : 52.41
PEG Ratio BN : 171.62 HLT : 0.85
PS Ratio BN : 1.36 HLT : 6.58
Total Revenue (TTM) BN : $76.58B HLT : $12.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) BN : $27.02B HLT : $5.44B
EBITDA (TTM) BN : $31.07B HLT : $3.00B

Return for Risk

BN vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 55
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

HLT

HLT Risk / Return Rank: 82
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BN vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BN	HLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.52	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.25	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.27	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	3.42	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.68	7.93	-6.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BN vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BN Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BN and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BN	HLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	1.52	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.83	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.27	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.23	+0.07

Drawdowns

BN vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and HLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BN	HLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.22%	-50.82%	-31.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.05%	-10.29%	-11.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.84%	-26.35%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.85%	-32.65%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.42%	-50.82%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.89%	-0.72%	-9.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.52%	-9.73%	-18.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	4.43%	+3.50%

Volatility

BN vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.93%. This indicates that BN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BN	HLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.72%	6.93%	+2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.37%	17.33%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.67%	23.12%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.24%	27.07%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.20%	181.03%	-150.83%

Dividends

BN vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than HLT's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BN Brookfield Corporation	0.57%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.33%	0.36%	0.00%	0.13%	0.54%	0.84%	31.40%	1.03%	0.65%

Financials

BN vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Corporation and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BN and HLT in my portfolio?

BN and HLT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BN or HLT?

BN has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BN dropped -82.22% vs HLT's -50.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.