BN vs. AWK
BN (Brookfield Corporation) and AWK (American Water Works Company, Inc.) are both stocks. BN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while AWK operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, BN returned 15.61%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for AWK. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BN vs. AWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly higher than AWK's -1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BN has outperformed AWK with an annualized return of 15.61%, while AWK has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.
BN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
AWK
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- -2.64%
- 1Y
- -8.27%
- 3Y*
- -2.50%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
BN vs. AWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | -1.31% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | -1.86% | 7.40% | -3.53% | -11.68% | -17.89% | 24.83% | 26.88% | 37.79% | 1.32% | 29.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BN and AWK is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2008 | 0.29 |
The correlation between BN and AWK shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BN:
$107.01B
AWK:
$24.63B
BN:
$0.56
AWK:
$5.65
BN:
80.05
AWK:
22.35
BN:
1.40
AWK:
4.73
BN:
2.50
AWK:
2.23
BN:
$76.58B
AWK:
$5.21B
BN:
$27.02B
AWK:
$2.27B
BN:
$31.07B
AWK:
$2.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN vs. AWK — Risk / Return Rank
BN
AWK
BN vs. AWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN) and American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BN | AWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.54 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | -0.99 | +2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BN vs. AWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN drawdown since its inception was -82.22%, which is greater than AWK's maximum drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN and AWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN | AWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.22% | -37.10% | -45.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -15.45% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -22.33% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | -37.10% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.42% | -37.10% | -14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -26.26% | +18.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -9.51% | -19.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | 8.38% | -0.39% |
Volatility
BN vs. AWK - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) at 6.28%. This indicates that BN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BN | AWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 6.28% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.60% | 15.71% | +6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.82% | 21.59% | +7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 22.93% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 23.72% | +6.45% |
Dividends
BN vs. AWK - Dividend Comparison
BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than AWK's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 2.67% | 2.49% | 2.41% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.96% | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.23% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
Financials
BN vs. AWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and American Water Works Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BN vs. AWK - Profitability Comparison
BN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
AWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 714.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
BN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
AWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 391.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.
BN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
AWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BN and AWK have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BN has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to AWK (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BN dropped -82.22% vs AWK's -37.10%.
BN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BN and AWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer