BMY vs. TIMB
BMY (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) and TIMB (TIM S.A.) are both stocks. BMY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while TIMB operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, BMY returned 0.73%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for TIMB. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMY vs. TIMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMY achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than TIMB's 15.30% return.
BMY
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.00%
TIMB
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BMY vs. TIMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 8.27% | 0.11% | 15.81% | -26.14% | 18.98% | 2.88% | 3.48% |
TIMB TIM S.A. | 15.30% | 86.96% | -33.24% | 68.57% | 4.05% | -13.46% | 23.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMY and TIMB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
BMY:
$116.75B
TIMB:
$10.65B
BMY:
$3.57
TIMB:
R$9.00
BMY:
16.02
TIMB:
12.63
BMY:
0.91
TIMB:
0.76
BMY:
2.40
TIMB:
2.02
BMY:
5.82
TIMB:
2.22
BMY:
$48.48B
TIMB:
R$27.04B
BMY:
$33.33B
TIMB:
R$14.61B
BMY:
$13.34B
TIMB:
R$13.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMY vs. TIMB — Risk / Return Rank
BMY
TIMB
BMY vs. TIMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and TIM S.A. (TIMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMY | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.22 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.32 | 3.35 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMY vs. TIMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMY drawdown since its inception was -72.03%, which is greater than TIMB's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY and TIMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMY | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.03% | -37.08% | -34.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -23.82% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.85% | -37.08% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -37.08% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.79% | -20.28% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -12.14% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.34% | 8.68% | -2.34% |
Volatility
BMY vs. TIMB - Volatility Comparison
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to TIM S.A. (TIMB) at 6.33%. This indicates that BMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMY | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 6.33% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 25.37% | -7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.08% | 31.42% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 31.55% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 32.10% | -6.81% |
Dividends
BMY vs. TIMB - Dividend Comparison
BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than TIMB's 8.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4.38% | 4.60% | 4.24% | 4.44% | 3.00% | 2.36% | 3.69% | 2.55% | 3.08% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 2.17% |
TIMB TIM S.A. | 8.17% | 11.67% | 6.03% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 3.43% | 3.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BMY vs. TIMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and TIM S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BMY vs. TIMB - Profitability Comparison
BMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
TIMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 6.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
BMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
TIMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
BMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.
TIMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TIM S.A. reported a net income of 817.09M and revenue of 6.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMY and TIMB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMY has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to TIMB (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMY dropped -72.03% vs TIMB's -37.08%.
TIMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMY and TIMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer