PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMVP vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.


BMVP

1D
0.73%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.60%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.43%

SPHD

1D
1.20%
1M
0.01%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.27%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
6.62%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.63%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and SPHD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.66

The correlation between BMVP and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

BMVP vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BMVP
SPHD

Industrials

16.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

16.4%
15.6%

Technology

16.4%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
3.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
5.1%

Communication Services

7.6%
8.6%

Real Estate

5.5%
20.1%

Energy

5.2%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
17.8%

Utilities

5.1%
13.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Industrials

BMVP
16.8%
SPHD
0.0%

Financial Services

BMVP
16.4%
SPHD
15.6%

Technology

BMVP
16.4%
SPHD
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BMVP
10.6%
SPHD
3.4%

Healthcare

BMVP
9.7%
SPHD
5.1%

Communication Services

BMVP
7.6%
SPHD
8.6%

Real Estate

BMVP
5.5%
SPHD
20.1%

Energy

BMVP
5.2%
SPHD
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

BMVP
5.1%
SPHD
17.8%

Utilities

BMVP
5.1%
SPHD
13.7%

Basic Materials

BMVP
1.6%
SPHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMVPSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.41

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

3.51

+1.28

BMVP vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMVPSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.93

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.41

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.58

-0.47

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-41.39%

-36.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-7.33%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-13.29%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-19.50%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-41.39%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-4.24%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-4.70%

-31.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.94%

-0.84%

Volatility

BMVP vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 2.26%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMVPSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.22%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

7.60%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

11.10%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

14.17%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

17.64%

+1.17%

BMVP vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMVP vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than SPHD's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.67%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.57%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMVP and SPHD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to BMVP (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, BMVP leads with 9.43% vs 7.17% for SPHD. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BMVP has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.67% for BMVP.

BMVP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.30% for SPHD.

BMVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMVP and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer