PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. RSHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMVP vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMVP vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
2.87%6.15%17.46%14.11%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
14.23%19.23%17.28%28.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 14.23% return.


BMVP

1D
0.27%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.46%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
9.18%

RSHO

1D
1.75%
1M
-7.69%
YTD
14.23%
6M
17.82%
1Y
48.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMVP vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RSHO
RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMVPRSHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

1.89

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

2.62

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

3.40

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.73

12.46

-9.73

BMVP vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and RSHO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMVPRSHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.89

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.29

-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and RSHO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMVP vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than RSHO's 0.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.73%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
0.26%0.30%0.26%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than RSHO's maximum drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and RSHO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPRSHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-27.31%

-50.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-14.64%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-8.85%

+3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-4.44%

-32.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.99%

-1.52%

Volatility

BMVP vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 3.09%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMVPRSHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

10.84%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

17.70%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

25.98%

-11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

21.92%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

21.92%

-3.08%