PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMQIX vs. BIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BMQIX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMQIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.15% return.


BMQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.88%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*

BIMIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.05%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BMQIX
Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.54%4.66%2.73%7.14%-7.73%3.46%9.96%1.19%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
-0.15%6.69%3.45%5.78%-8.64%-1.41%7.42%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BMQIX and BIMIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.49

The correlation between BMQIX and BIMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMQIX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMQIX
BMQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BMQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BMQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMIX
BIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BMQIX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMQIXBIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.29

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.87

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

5.39

+4.18

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMQIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the BIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMQIX and BIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMQIXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

1.55

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.30

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.17

-0.41

Drawdowns

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMQIX drawdown since its inception was -12.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BIMIX drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMQIX and BIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMQIXBIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-12.76%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.07%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.01%

-2.44%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.71%

-12.76%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.42%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-1.48%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.71%

+0.05%

Volatility

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BMQIX) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that BMQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMQIXBIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.74%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

1.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

2.49%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.62%

3.88%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

3.25%

+1.23%

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMQIX and BIMIX have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

BMQIX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison

BMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BIMIX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.72%3.67%3.89%3.21%2.17%2.27%3.49%2.52%2.50%2.35%2.21%2.57%
BMQIX
Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.42%3.40%3.72%3.45%2.56%2.57%3.98%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMQIX and BIMIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMQIX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to BIMIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMQIX dropped -12.71% vs BIMIX's -12.76%.

BMQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMQIX and BIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer